User talk:236TruthTeller

USS Silversides
If you have something to say, find sourced material and put it in with more neutral wording. Let the reality speak for itself. North8000 (talk) 22:43, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't know who you are but I have been involved in the Silversides for 30 YEARS and I have been THERE. I have seen the reality and experienced these things first-hand. You keep deleting the reality and I'll just keep adding more reality.


 * Well, I don't know it like you do, but did go aboard it a few times about 45-48 years year ago and slept on it about 12 years ago.  As a new editor I know that you don't fully understand this, but it is inevitable that the kind of stuff you are putting in and the way that you are writing it can't stay in Wikipedia.  I might try rewording what you did to give it at least a chance of staying in, but for a sure thing as a minimum you'll need to source any accusatory or controversial statements.   Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 11:08, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

USS Silversides (SS-236) article please stop
You have been putting in material which is egregious violations of policy. When I correct even the worst 5% of those you have been reverting me. If you continue this I will be forced to report you. And I really don't want to do that. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 10:23, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Even better, would be if you could go in and reword the other 95% to be more neutrally worded and provide sourcing for at least some of that. North8000 (talk) 10:23, 27 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't know who died and made you king of situations in which you have no first-hand knowledge. Keep doing what you're doing and I'll keep correcting it and if you report me, other people who also are familiar with these matters will step in and continue to correct them. You are WAY out of line and out of your league.


 * You just put back in one of the worst items. OK, I am forced to report you and am doing so.    I say "forced" because I have a feeling that out there in the real world on this I would be at and on your side.  But you must realize that in Wikipedia terms what you are doing is an egregious violation. North8000 (talk) 11:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You have forced me to report you at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 12:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

No one has "forced" you to be the small person you are who finds it necessary to stick your nose where it doesn't belong and into affairs about which you have no knowledge. Not sure how you live with yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 236TruthTeller (talk • contribs) 19:03, 1 June 2012‎

BLP and NPOV violations
I've deleted quite a bit of material as violations of our WP:BLP policy. Even where you haven't named specific names, you have added unsourced material that attacks organisations and organisations have real people running them. You also need to read WP:NPOVN. We take our BLP policy very seriously and if you reinsert the material without reliable sources (see WP:RS you are likely to be blocked, possibly by me. Dougweller (talk) 12:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

So it's OK with someone with NO first-hand knowledge to report on someone who DOES?? That's seriously messed up, Dude. What about my rights to post the truth? Why not block North8000 for infringing on my right to share complete information? 236TruthTeller. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 236TruthTeller (talk • contribs) 23:32, 2 June 2012‎
 * Being an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is not written from first hand knowledge, it is written from what reliable sources have published about a subject, and you must not add your own personal judgment or analysis to an article - have a read of WP:RS and WP:OR, which explain these key policies in some detail. And also please understand that you have no *rights* to edit here whatsoever - you are allowed the privilege of editing only if you do so in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. In addition to being properly sourced, additions to Wikipedia articles must comply with WP:NPOV and be written from a neutral point of view, and with WP:BLP which means that you must not add any negative comments about living people or groups of people unless they are properly sourced - making potentially libelous accusations or accusations of criminal activity without proof is especially forbidden. If you read the policy pages I have given you links to, and feel you can continue to edit without breaking any of those policies and help us create neutrally-written content without trying to push any personal agenda, then please feel free to follow the instructions in the block notice below to request unblock. But please also be warned that while blocked you are allowed to edit this talk page solely for pursuing unblock, not for criticizing the actions of other editors - if you continue to do the latter, you are very likely to lose the ability to edit here. (And finally, when you comment, please sign your comments by appending " ~ ", which will add your username and the date and time) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:31, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks, on top of your repeated pushing of derogatory material in contravention of Wikipedia's WP:BLP and WP:NPOV policies. You have done nothing else but pursue your single purpose here, and you will not be unblocked unless you can convince us that you have something positive to contribute. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:12, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * In addition, if you post one more personal attack here on this Talk page, you will lose the ability to edit here altogether. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:13, 1 June 2012 (UTC)