User talk:24.104.46.203

March 2014
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Jim Estes, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:12, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 05:12, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alejandro Villanueva (American football) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dan Koehl (talk) 21:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2021
Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Running on Empty (song), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 03:03, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Copacabana (song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 03:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at I Go Crazy (Paul Davis song), you may be blocked from editing. ''Please don't use 45cat as a reference. It contains user-generated content, and we avoid it. See WP:ALBUMAVOID.'' Binksternet (talk) 04:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Baker Street (song). Stop citing 45cat. Binksternet (talk) 03:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

September 2022
Your recent editing history at Hangin' on a String (Contemplating) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Stop citing 45cat. Binksternet (talk) 18:20, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm 1AmNobody24. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Remember (Walking in the Sand), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)