User talk:24.119.164.113

2019 Venezuelan protests
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 2019 Venezuelan protests. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jamez42 (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I think there's a happy medium here. Another part of the article mentions a coup in the 1950's. Many people would find that offensive, and they call it something other than a coup. That needs to be challenged. One person's coup is another country's liberation. Objectivity is impossible in these matters. Word choice from mainstream journalists always reflect opinion. I used the word dictator, which has an objective definition. It's a leader that is installed without an election, or at least without an election that meets certain criteria which vary somewhat. What is most misleading about the article is that it doesn't trace the causes of the current transition. There are competing empires with interests in that country. One just announced, through John Bolton, that the plan is to take their oil for US companies. That's objective fact. There are plenty of legit sources, and videos, to back that up. The whole article is misleading without this important context. Thanks.