User talk:24.127.236.115

December 2019
Hello, I'm FlightTime Phone. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Rolling Stones without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - FlightTime Phone  ( open channel ) 22:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:The Rolling Stones albums, you may be blocked from editing without further warnings. Thank you, - FlightTime Phone  ( open channel ) 22:32, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Using multiple accounts
Hello, 24.127.236.115, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. - FlightTime Phone  ( open channel ) 22:44, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Edit Warring With Another Wikipedia User
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Beauty School Dropout (talk) 05:56, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Led Zeppelin, you may be blocked from editing without further warnings. Thank you, ''

A discussion is ongoing'' - FlightTime Phone  ( open channel ) 15:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on The Cure. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Rob van  vee  06:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Jitters
Hello, 24.127.236.115,

I would kindly like to let you know that your recent edits over at Jitters may be considered distributive. Wikipedia is not a place for original research (What Wikipedia is not), and, by writing articles, we are going to rely upon third-party, independent, notable, and reliable sources rather than push our personal takeaways, as it was pointed out by me over at Talk:Jitters_(band) and in comments to the recent edits of that article itself.

If you are going to made distributive edits even further, your actions will be reported.

Have a great day! (◕‿◕✿)

P.S. If you want to judge music genres, styles, and give assessment of such music things down the line, please consider to become a contributor to any of top categorized media or such rather than classifying things by your own and removing sourced content. -- pr12402, 8 January, 2020

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to The Rolling Stones. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (24.127.236.115) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Clover moss (talk) 22:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Judas Priest, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 15:35, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Judas Priest‎; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 15:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.