User talk:24.129.248.159

October 2022
Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Little Games—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 06:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello --
 * I must disagree with your view. This page gives an incorrect version of the spoken passage in "Glimpses." Why would Wikipedia want to perpetuate this inaccuracy? Don't you want Wikipedia to reflect information that is as accurate as possible?
 * Rather than simply correcting the phrase, I also gave the reasoning behind my correction, which seemed like a good thing to do.
 * I can provide a link to a YouTube video with the isolated spoken passage that proves the point I'm making. (It is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPmmwfhz-JU.) I'm not proficient enough in Wikipedia editing to add this and its corresponding footnote, so I didn't do it. But it is a valid citation.
 * Please reconsider your position. Not trying to be a smart guy, but I don't see what is "constructive" about a Wikipedia page that perpetuates incorrect information.
 * Thank you,
 * Mike
 * (fireglo360@zoominternet.net) 24.129.248.159 (talk) 06:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)