User talk:24.133.120.192

August 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on RT (TV network). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mathglot (talk) 01:26, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Discretionary sanctions, and CIVIL behavior
Beyond the edit warring at RT (TV network) is subject to ArbCom discretionary sanctions and reverts at that article are limited to one per day. You are already risking a block for that alone. Adding comments in your edit summary with your multiple reverts such as, "if you write again "propaganda" i will delete again. this is wikipedia, not westpedia. fucker." makes it much worse, as it is against our policy on WP:CIVILITY, and is a further threat to edit war.

Please calm down, go to the talk page, and raise a discussion there, if you don't agree with the current content of the article. If you continue to edit war or act badly with your fellow editors, you risk having your editing privileges suspended. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 01:33, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Are you sending that message to NATO's propagandists? 24.133.120.192 (talk) 03:17, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Are you sending that message to NATO's propagandists too? Please! 24.133.120.192 (talk) 03:17, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your edit-warring, uncivility, and disruptive behavior NOW
Your repeated reverts, your threats in the edit summaries to carry on with your edit warring no matter what anyone does, and your use of foul language towards other editors, whether collectively or targeted, are completely unacceptable at Wikipedia. Consider this a final warning to stop your disruptive behavior, edit warring, and foul attitude towards others immediately. Further behavior of this nature will result in your being blocked from editing. Mathglot (talk) 09:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 09:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Dirkbb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Firat News Agency have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Not what the link refers to Dirkbb (talk) 21:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, List of equipment of the Russian Ground Forces. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Irish Independent without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 07:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: North Press Agency (January 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:North Press Agency and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:North_Press_Agency Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pythoncoder&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:North_Press_Agency reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 23:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:North Press Agency
Hello, 24.133.120.192. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North Press Agency, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:North Press Agency


Hello, 24.133.120.192. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "North Press Agency".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)