User talk:24.154.55.189

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Awesome worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Miquonranger03 (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. William Avery (talk) 14:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Golf has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk)  18:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Southeastern United States constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Ncmvocalist (talk) 18:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Southern United States has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Matthew  Yeager  19:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Sack of Rome (410) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Eric-Wester (talk) 15:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Sack of Rome (410) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Oliver202 (talk) 15:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sack of Rome (410). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Oliver202 (talk) 15:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Council of Chalcedon. Oliver202 (talk) 15:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Charles Lindbergh has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 15:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Jungle, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Jungle was changed by 24.154.55.189 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-04-01T14:40:04+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Knights of Columbus. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Tide  rolls  14:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Unitarianism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 16:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Presbyterianism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Alpha Quadrant (alt)    talk    17:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Unitarianism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you! -- Alpha Quadrant (alt)    talk    18:00, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Presbyterianism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   17:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Presbyterianism. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Abu Torsam   17:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Presbyterianism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Minima c  ( talk ) 17:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Hydrus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Bped1985 (talk) 14:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Oregano, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Oregano was changed by 24.154.55.189 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926325 on 2011-03-25T17:51:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2012
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:14, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014
Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Chinese zodiac, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lugia2453 (talk) 15:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Peter SamFan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Hancock has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Peter  Sam   Fan  14:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Hancock. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Hancock was changed by 24.154.55.189 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962984 on 2016-05-12T14:37:18+00:00.

September 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to John of Antioch has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:06, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: John of Antioch was changed by 24.154.55.189 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891448 on 2017-09-07T15:06:37+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. – Gilliam (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018
Hello, I'm Anaxial. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Paper sons have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Anaxial (talk) 19:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese Exclusion Act. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chinese Exclusion Act was changed by 24.154.55.189 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913074 on 2018-01-23T19:31:05+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Chinese Exclusion Act, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 19:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese Exclusion Act. Simplexity22 (talk) 19:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2018
Hello, I'm Pablomartinez. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Upton Sinclair— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PabloMartinez (talk) 18:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Upton Sinclair. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:11, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at William M. Tweed, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 18:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.