User talk:24.17.106.158

March 2023
Hello, I'm Riverbend21. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Tommy Thayer have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Riverbend21 (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)


 * put a source on this blp claim, please. 24.17.106.158 (talk) 20:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Marcus Stroman, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you recently removed content from Boca Grande, Florida without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donald Albury 21:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)


 * hello.
 * i may have been in error, but the formatting and image placement for the state/county locator map seemed at first glance to be wildly inaccurate.
 * i attempted to bring it more in line with other similar articles.
 * thank you for bringing it to my attention.
 * s 24.17.106.158 (talk) 01:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Boyinaroom. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Paul M. Hebert Law Center. Redlinks are useful and can often be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" link (in the tools listed at the left in desktop view) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Please only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Boyinaroom (talk) 07:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)


 * you're wrong on this one.
 * notable alumni must have an article for addition.
 * reverting.
 * please see talk page
 * thank you,
 * s 24.17.106.158 (talk) 08:00, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paul M. Hebert Law Center, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Boyinaroom (talk) 08:00, 20 June 2023 (UTC)


 * again, you're wrong on this one.
 * notable lists must have an article.
 * reverting.
 * thanks for helping keep Wikipedia accurate,
 * s 24.17.106.158 (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with 24.17.106.158, it is general practice to not}} add names of people for whom notability has not yet been established to lists of "Notable ...". [[User:Alt.Donald Albury|Alt.Donald Albury (talk) 17:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * another editor has made a brief and sufficiently persuasive argument to the contrary, and i don't have the inclination to debate.
 * I've been editing for this specific error for many, many years.
 * cordially,
 * s 24.17.106.158 (talk) 22:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions to Phil Collins&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Picard&#39;s Facepalm (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm TLJ7863. I noticed that you recently removed content from Planking (fad) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TLJ7863 (talk) 19:35, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Planking (fad), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Willking1979 (talk) 01:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring
Three different editors have restored the status quo version of the article Planking (fad), against your deletions of content. This demonstrates there is a form of consensus that the material should be included. If you revert again, it will clearly be construed as edit warring. If you still feel the material shouldn't be included, you need to leave the article as is, and start a discussion on the article's talk page, and see if there is a consensus that supports your deletions. At this time, it appears there is not, so the burden is on you to demonstrate otherwise. This is in line with our editing expectations in WP:BRD. This is probably the only warning you will get before getting blocked, should you decide to continue reverting the material out of the article. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 21:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Bestagon ⬡ 01:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC)