User talk:24.172.13.66

April 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Forsyth Country Day School has been reverted. Your edit here to Forsyth Country Day School was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/forsythcountrydayschool/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

July 2018
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Forsyth Country Day School— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:58, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Forsyth Country Day School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 16:15, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Forsyth Country Day School shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 17:20, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 17:33, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello IP editor. You haven't got much time to sort out this problem. This IP address has been blocked for a long as two years in the past because it was thought to be only a source of WP:Vandalism. You can change this impression if you act fast, and promise to stop warring at Forsyth Country Day School. Your stated reasons for removing this content are quite baffling. If the school had some past issues regarding segregation, that's not irrelevant to our readers. EdJohnston (talk) 19:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Surviv.io— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 17:24, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm LPS and MLP Fan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Echidna have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 18:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Echidna. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- NotCh arizar d 🗨 18:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

January 2023
Hello, I'm Fehufanga. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Granite—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 14:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Granite. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — 3PPYB6 (T / C / L) — 14:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Granite, you may be blocked from editing. — 3PPYB6 (T / C / L) — 14:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Granite. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 14:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 years for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. gadfium 20:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)