User talk:24.172.16.91

December 2012
Hello, I'm Rocketrod1960. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ross Bagley because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rocketrod1960 03:19, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Operation Medak Pocket, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 11:35, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Infobox battles
As the infobox is intended to summarize key points about the Navy, we cannot add links to the various individual battles which involved Navy units. To keep it from becoming a laundry list of every battle, we've got to restrict the listing to big stuff like WWII. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 21:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Invasion of Canada (1775). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. TEDickey (talk) 09:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Allegiance field in infoboxes
Hello, the allegiance field in Template:Infobox military unit is intended to only be used to "indicate the allegiance of units which are not part of the regular armed forces of a sovereign state". As such, I've removed it from the the Australian, Canadian and NZ armed services articles as it's not appropriate. Hope this is OK with you. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 09:50, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Battle of Plattsburgh vandalism
For the third time in a month you have introduced tendentious edits for which you have no concensus into the info. box for this article. You have not provided any rationale for these edits, nor discussed them on the article's talk page. This is clearly edit warring. This user for which this IP is a sockpuppet has already been contacted by the administrators for sockpuppetry. If this disruptive behaviour continues, I will seek stronger measures from the administrators. HLGallon (talk) 00:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Uncited/unsourced, unhelpful changes
Hello, I'm Josh3580. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Witpoort, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Josh3580 talk/hist 09:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 11:01, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to United States Coast Guard, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal was not constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:31, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please do not overcrowd articles with images. Images should be near relevant text and should not sandwich text. See other guidelines at WP:MOSIM. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:34, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.