User talk:24.176.11.42

I find it dubious that historyofpoetry claims *not* to be Barrett Watten. Dr. Watten advised my dissertation. I know his writing impeccably well, and have no doubt he himself is engaging in these edit exercises out of pure self-interest. I think it best that he and stophidingbehind are both banned from editing, and suggest language acknowledging the allegations against Dr. Watten and citing the Chronicle of Higher Ed. The Chronicle is as good a journalistic source as one will find regarding a university situation such as this. The allegations of Dr. Watten may hold interest to academics, students, and higher ed professionals, but given the nature of the allegations, it is extremely unlikely another news source would publicize them due to it being a niche controversy and lacking the spectacle of a more egregious allegation. The Chronicle is one of the few newsmagazines for higher education, and is both the best (and perhaps only) source to verify this content.