User talk:24.191.31.240

September 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jim Cummings, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 19:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Note the same edits being made by User:47.19.201.167.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to Jack Angel
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jack Angel, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  22:00, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I noticed that you recently removed content from Philip Proctor without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 23:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Filmography material in the lead
Excessive filmography material does not belong in the lead or in the career section. We have the filmography section for that. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:56, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Antz, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. credits Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Antz. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:30, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Isaiah Washington shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dr. Dolittle 2. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ron h jones (Talk) 14:57, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Laraine Newman have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 20:46, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.