User talk:24.2.162.192

September 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Mr. Robot (TV series). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 03:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Just a heads up, but given that you've attempted to put your edits forward four times within 24 hours, this case is eligible to be reported to the administrators at WP:AN3. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 03:27, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Disruptive and baseless instigation
Maybe if the other reverts had sensible explanations -- or even ANY explanation you would have a case. Reverts with "Ugh" and "It's the correct term" (when it wasn't actually that clear) or simply nothing in them are baseless. They're nothing more than bullying someone into submission. How could it be anything else? -- there are no explanations!

In the wake of all that power projection (bullying) I maintained my cool and tried to bring a civil discussion to the talk page.

By your 1) supporting a process of constantly reverting good faith well explained edits with unexplained or ambiguously explained ones, 2) attempting this agressive flanking-maneuver power play (above), and 3) simply framing otherwise relatively civil back-and-forth as "edit war", you are marshaling and trying to build up nothing into a something you can call an "edit war". Instigating a so-called "edit war" like that is disruptive uber-edit-warring (meta-edit-warring?).  Passive aggression is still aggression.  It's WP:uncivil and violates a host of other policies too.

So, pay attention to what's actually happening before shooting your mouth off. I'm trying to resolve something on the talk page and you are disrupting an otherwise (relatively) civil process by pulling this.

24.2.162.192 (talk) 19:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)