User talk:24.218.153.156

24.218.153.156 (talk) 02:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)I'll give up if you really do not like my modification. The information that I added is already included in those references listed at the end of this Wikipedia article. Obviously, you never contacted Cao, who developed the ORAC method. But please understand, the ORAC assay and the USDA ORAC database are two different things. ORAC assay is a valid tool in studying free radicals and antioxidants. The issue is that we never had a valid ORAC database which nutritionists can use to study the relationship between the ORAC intake (antioxidants) and diseases in humans. The food extracts extremely high in ORAC can be beneficial or harmful to a human body.

December 2018
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Oxygen radical absorbance capacity. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''ORAC is a phenomenon of the test tube, with no relevance to human biology or aging. Reputable sources no longer discuss it.'' Zefr (talk) 00:26, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.