User talk:24.228.190.254

Comet Ping Pong
Log in and use your account. You appear to be trying to evade scrutiny via IP. Your question was asked and answered, and you are approaching a block for disruptive and tendentious editing to promote a conspiracy theory. The edit filter worked as intended, to stop attempts to re-open a closed discussion.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:49, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't have an account currently. If I had an account, I'd be eligible to edit the article directly -- I lost my password for User:Doug Cousins. Is it possible to recover it? Despite not having an active account, my discussion has improved the article, since before I pointed out that no DC Metro Police quote was linked to in the article, the article did not have a proper citation for this claim. Then, discussion was closed by biased editor NorthBySouthBaranof, who has also nearly been banned for other disruptive editing. Reasonable discussion is not a good rationale for a ban. 24.228.190.254 (talk) 15:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Your editing is identical to that of AOKuneff, in time, content and persistence in beating the same dead horse. The discussion was properly closed. Wikipedia isn't a congenial home for promotion of defamatory conspiracy theories.  Acroterion   (talk)   15:08, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

If you had email enabled, you can request a temporary password and the reset it. Otherwise, you can create a new account and explicitly link to to the previous account.  Acroterion   (talk)   16:09, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

You should be glad I hatted that thread, if you have any interest in continuing to edit here; had Acroterion been the first to see your response, they probably would have just blocked you on sight. You're not getting the message, so here it is one last time: The sourcing is acceptable, Pizzagate is entirely bullshit, we're not going to play footsie with conspiracy theorists, and if you disagree, you'll be politely invited to leave. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 18:31, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Your response isn't what's expected from a good-faith contributor. You appear to be trying to do away with the well-sourced mention that the MPD has stated that there is no substance to the hoax, by trying to misrepresent sourcing policy. That's not acceptable.  Acroterion   (talk)   21:56, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   11:42, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

lol
lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.223.66.53 (talk) 20:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)