User talk:24.228.20.167

March 2023
Hello, I'm S0091. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Huey P. Newton seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 22:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Huey P. Newton, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Someone who&#39;s wrong on the internet (talk) 05:12, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! 

Hello, Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Although you're free to perform most tasks on Wikipedia without registering, it's highly recommended you create an account as there are many added benefits. It's private and secure and it's also free, simple, and quick to do.

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your IP address linked to your contributions page (however, if you create an account, your IP address will be hidden and you will be able to build a custom signature that can link to your own user page), a link to this (this IP's talk) page, and a timestamp.

 Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 15:15, 13 March 2023 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:WelcomeVisual/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]


 * Hi IP, please do provide edit summaries as it helps other editors who are reviewing changes. Also, be careful with the sources you are using.  Some are primary, usually those affiliated with Newtown or the BPP.  Primary sources include interviews or first hand accounts, even it they are published by an otherwise reliable source.  For example, the New York Times is generally considered a high-quality source but if the content within the article is largely what a subject says, with no analysis then it is considered primary rather than secondary.  While primary sources are fine to use for uncontroversial claims, secondary sources are preferred and are required for controversial claims.  S0091 (talk) 15:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)