User talk:24.234.149.110

I am commenting on this article to ensure that the statements within are factual and come from sources, not opinions or subjective interpretations.

ARTICLE STATEMENT: 'Parler is an American social networking service founded in 2018 as a competitor to Twitter." >>There is no source for the statement that Parler was 'founded .... as a competitor to Twitter" >>>"Parler provides a Commenting and Social News platform for digital publishers, influencers, bloggers, writers, politicians and social users to share news, opinions and content in real time. Additionally, we provide enterprise tools to enhance online blogs, media and websites with direct social integrations and monetization capabilities" >>>'71 Republic Launches Technology Integration with Parler - We recently integrated our website with Parler. Parler is the technology behind the new commenting system for our articles.'

ARTICLE STATEMENT: 'It is primarily used by persons associated with Donald Trump and the far-right.' >>There is no source for the statement that Parler is 'used by .... the far-right'; therefore, this is an opinion statement. >>>https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/445740-trump-2020-campaign-manager-checking-out-alternative-conservative-friendly >>>https://video.foxnews.com/v/6042145888001/?playlist_id=2777472138001#sp=show-clips

ARTICLE STATEMENT: 'Consequently, according to Politico, much of its content belongs to that category, such as Islamophobic and anti-feminist messages.' >>The source for this statement is correct, but the Politico article makes a subjective assumption 'much of the content posted on Parler falls into categories deemed offensive and discouraged by the large platforms — such as anti-Islam and anti-feminist sentiment.' Also, the article does not ever use the word 'Islamaphobic'. >>>The article quotes from a single unverified Parler user as saying “Where are my fellow feminists why is the oppression of women ok if it's in the name of ISLAM ? Why are Moslems treated differently free from criticism.” >>>A factual statement about the majority of content cannot be derived from a single user post.

ACTICLE STATEMENT: 'Its activity is "devoted mostly to a small universe of Trump-friendly discussions." >>The source for this statement is quoted "Activity on the site appears to be devoted mostly to a small universe of Trump-friendly discussions." >>>The quote for this is edited to mislead a reader, since the article sourced is making a statement based on activity he/she 'appears' to see. >>>A factual statement about the activity on the site cannot be made based off an assumption.

June 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Parler, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thunderchunder (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)