User talk:24.243.178.144

September 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Chuck Grassley. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 00:36, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 02:06, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at Chuck Grassley. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jayron 32 03:15, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Please note that this is not about whether you are right or wrong; however the repeated attempt to revert other people in the article text is disruptive. When the block expires, instead of using edit summaries and repeatedly reverting the text, start a discussion at Talk:Chuck Grassley and first establish consensus for your proposed changes.  Behavior, not content, is what leads to blocks.  And you have not behaved correctly here.  -- Jayron 32 03:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Nice to see that administrators couldn't care less about Wikipedia rules
YOU BLOCKED ME AFTER I REPORTED MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS OF WIKIPEDIA RULES!!!