User talk:24.243.5.146

December 2011
Hello, and welcome! I notice you made a comment that seemed less than civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like us to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner, and to comment on the contributions, not the contributors. Thank you! —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   03:39, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Ur a bot, so QQ

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Stormy Daniels. Thank you. ''Wikipedia is not a tabloid. Adding negative material sourcing it to TMZ is just unacceptable.'' Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:59, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Who gives a shit if YOU consider it unacceptable? You ain't tunning Wikipedia.  Besides, you have not explained your reasons why TMZ is not acceptable.  TMZ is owned by Time-Warner and a branch of CNN news service.


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * You've been warned about your abusive language. Continuing to do so will cause other editors to ignore your arguments and get you blocked. As for TMZ, several other editors have deemed it unacceptable . It's not CNN or a part of CNN so stop trying to equate the two. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Stormy Daniels. Thank you. Please see WP:BLPGOSSIP for more information. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Stormy Daniels, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:38, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:05, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.




 * The appropriate method for building consensus is "be bold, revert, discuss"... not "be bold, revert, continue being bold, edit war". Likewise, whether it is a WP:RS or not, would you care to explain this edit summary? -- Kinu  t/c 06:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not sure what you want me to explain or what you mean by edit summary? The information that I added is written in plain language and seems pretty understandable.  She got a restraining order in court.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Savant syndrome, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to File:Man-wolves.jpg, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)