User talk:24.3.220.206

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia thanks
Thanks for keeping the above article up to date. Cheers.  young  american (wtf?) 16:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Recent changes patrol
 * Anti-vandalism tools

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but I highly recommend that you  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 18:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Adding honorific and updated religion in infobox
Please do not add the honorific prefix to any of these wiki pages. Please do not edit the specific religious sect to add what church they are apart of. None of your edits were cited.

I have gone through and revered most of your edits but it will take some time to undo the rest of them. If you could please re frame from doing this again it would be extremely helpful.--Triesault (talk) 02:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Lee Terry. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. ''There is no "honorific" for representatives that I'm aware of. If that's mistaken, then please add a source, but in any case you need to stop reverting on the page and explain your point.'' Shadowjams (talk) 05:54, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Stop reverting now, or you may be blocked Shadowjams (talk) 05:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You are violating the three-revert rule on several articles.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. - Zhang He (talk) 05:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Tim Song (talk) 06:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It is absolutely essential, when making changes to multiple articles, to either discuss the changes beforehand, or stop once the changes have been disputed and discuss them before going further. You did neither. Tim Song (talk) 06:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: Honorifics
Please read MOS:HONORIFIC. -- &oelig; &trade; 06:15, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page United States Senate election in Nevada, 2010 has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2010/6/2/NV/541. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:11, 3 June 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.