User talk:24.38.200.90

Please explain on talk page for Sydney Shoemaker the reasons for the deletion, do not just keep deleting it. Thank you.Philosophy Junkie (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

You must first get consensus on the talk page for your proposed change, and you can only achieve that by explaining why you think the change should be made.Philosophy Junkie (talk) 21:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

May 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sydney Shoemaker, you may be blocked from editing. You have a history of deleting this material going back a year, but you've yet to explain why you're deleting it. —C.Fred (talk) 21:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sydney Shoemaker. —C.Fred (talk) 17:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 02:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * I see that after your block has expired, you have again removed student information from the Sydney Shoemaker article. The big problem with this is that you have offered no explanation of why you are deleting the material. With no explanation provided, this looks like vandalism. We welcome you to engage in discussion at Talk:Sydney Shoemaker about why you think the material should be removed. You may very well have a good reason, and other editors will agree with you, so consensus emerges to remove it. However, the more attempts are made to remove the information disruptively, the more likely it becomes that longer-term administrative actions, like a block on this IP address, will be taken to protect the article. —C.Fred (talk) 20:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Sydney Shoemaker) for a period of 1 month for Persistent vandalism of a single article. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 02:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Sydney Shoemaker) for a period of 6 months for persistent disruption of the article. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 17:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cornell realism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 19:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Y.ssk. Your recent edit to Cornell realism appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Y.  ssk  10:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Moral realism. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Isabelle 🔔 16:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Moral realism, you may be blocked from editing. jp×g 01:57, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 06:38, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Moral realism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Quid Est Squid (talk) 01:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Moral realism, you may be blocked from editing. ... disco spinster   talk  01:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sydney Shoemaker. ... disco spinster   talk  01:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Moral realism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 15:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)