User talk:24.44.196.20

July 2015
Hello, I'm KylieTastic. Your recent edit to the page Main Hoon Na appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 21:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered. I noticed that you recently removed some content from American and British English spelling differences without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DBaK (talk) 20:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

''Please read and note this. It really does help the rest of us a LOT if you use an edit summary! Thanks.''

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! DBaK (talk) 20:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thanks
Thanks very much for this. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 21:06, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The New Yorker because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --I am  k6ka  Talk to me!   See what I have done  00:46, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The New Yorker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --I am  k6ka  Talk to me!   See what I have done  00:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Mop Seeker  Fox  Three!  00:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The New Yorker. --I am  k6ka  Talk to me!   See what I have done  00:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Neil N  talk to me 02:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Nanga Punga Dost page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=678001713 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F678001713%7CNanga Punga Dost%5D%5D Ask for help])

September 2015
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Humpty Sharma Ki Dulhania without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 21:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Illegal immigration to the United States, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU '' ( talk ) 20:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 🍜, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~  Nott Nott  talk &#124; contrib 20:41, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Gauri Khan— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU '' ( talk ) 20:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gauri Khan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU '' ( talk ) 21:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of words having different meanings in American and British English: M–Z— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hate Story 3, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Hate Story 3. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Diff: I'm going to explain this to you in a way that I hope makes sense: Wikipedia is not interested in editors' personal interpretations. Just because a song sounds like another song to you, does not mean that it is a copy of the other. That comparison, like all other comparisons, needs to come from reliable published sources. If there was a copyright suit over the similarity, and if a judge said "it's a copy", then we could include it. If critics said "song A sounds like a copy of song B", then we could say "critics noted a strong similarity between song A and song B". However, you cannot add "this is a copy" to an encyclopedia, just like you can't add "Madhuri Dixit is beautiful" to an encyclopedia. These are your opinions, and they constitute original research. Please do not resubmit this content again without ample sources from reliable publications.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Hate Story 3. Jim1138 (talk) 04:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:34, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The IP editor either doesn't understand that making the statement without supporting the statement is a useless contribution, or they're deliberately being disruptive. Neither scenario is a good one. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:41, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

My reverts...
Dang! You're absolutely right! I completely misread your edits. sorry about that! I've undone my reverts. —  Wasell ( T ) 19:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to Bhola Bhala
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 21:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Please do not change all settings on the internet. 24.44.196.20 (talk) 04:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  livelikemusic   talk!  04:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:49, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to B. S. Sahay, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. (Massive removal of URLs) --Floatjon (talk) 16:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I explained clearly in the edit summary. Did you not read this? – "Fix incorrect ref formatting – You can help!" 24.44.196.20 (talk) 01:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I see that -- but your fix was entirely wrong. While it stopped the error message, it deleted a large amount of useful data and rendered several references useless.--Floatjon (talk) 23:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)