User talk:24.45.165.154/sandbox

Article evaluation
Article link: Amazon_(company) '''1.Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? ''' Yes, everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. The article includes the background information of Amazon, history, and timeline of the company.

'''2. Is anything missing that could be added? ''' Yes, the article could add some information about Amazon Business, because the Amazon Business platform is a really important information that readers need to know.

'''3.Check a few citations. Do the links work? ''' All links are work. '''4.Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? ''' Yes, the article looks neutral. The article has covered good aspect of the company and bad aspect of it.

'''5.Does the source support the claims in the article? ''' The sources support the claims in the article.

'''6.What else could be improved? ''' The article could mention more about Amazon Web Services and the strategy of Amazon. It mentioned too much about the taxation, maybe readers are not interest in this topic. --Dw2460 (talk) 08:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)