User talk:24.46.151.135

February 2022
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits, such as those to Charles Ponzi, appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. —&#8288;&#8202;&#8288;BarrelProof (talk) 15:56, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Battleground
Please see WP:BATTLEGROUND. Your edits to Talk:Elizabeth Holmes are a clear violation and must stop immediately. --Yamla (talk) 11:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm Chevvin. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Gateway, Inc. seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Chevvin 05:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)