User talk:24.46.32.66

June 2021
Hello, I'm C.Fred. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Sydney Shoemaker have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 02:58, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sydney Shoemaker, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 23:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl. I noticed that in this edit to Sydney Shoemaker, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. &#8213; Qwerfjkl  &#124; 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂 (please use&#32; on reply) 18:28, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Sydney Shoemaker. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ifnord (talk) 22:26, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

October 2021
Hello, I'm Dirkbb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Moral realism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Dirkbb (talk) 22:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sydney Shoemaker, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 22:02, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Moral realism, you may be blocked from editing. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:09, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Sydney Shoemaker. Dirkbb (talk) 22:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)