User talk:24.51.201.102

January 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Thomas Aquinas, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Priest. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — JThistle38 (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

June 2022
Hello, I'm Smallangryplanet. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Trenbolone have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Smallangryplanet (talk) 12:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)