User talk:24.51.232.119

November 2021
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Battle of Vimy Ridge—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  15:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Rhins of Galloway—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rhins of Galloway. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Terry Bradshaw, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Terry Bradshaw was changed by 24.51.232.119 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964518 on 2022-01-17T18:18:13+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Terry Bradshaw. Serols (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Spencer T• C 17:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Terry Bradshaw have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Terry Bradshaw was changed by 24.51.232.119 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969503 on 2022-02-11T15:27:23+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ingemar Stenmark. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ingemar Stenmark was changed by 24.51.232.119 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928497 on 2022-02-11T15:43:19+00:00

April 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sea breeze, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. &#128156; melecie   talk  - 14:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 14:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2022
Hello, I'm HelenDegenerate. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to John Herrington have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. HelenDegenerate (💬📖) 19:11, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Herrington. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Herrington was changed by 24.51.232.119 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971187 on 2022-09-28T19:13:00+00:00

March 2024
Hello, I'm Jacona. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Hog's Back Falls—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jacona (talk) 14:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)