User talk:24.51.253.30

July 2024
Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Abbey Park High School have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC)


 * That seems arbitrary. I could argue 90% of the content on wikipedia does not "appear constructive". Like every other edit on the sports page it is detailing true events within the abbey park community that have significance to it's history (chamionships, notable events, etc.) 24.51.253.30 (talk) 20:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Abbey Park High School. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. ''Also, do not add content to an article that cannot be verified in a reliable source. see WP:V.'' —Smalljim  20:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Abbey Park High School. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 21:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)