User talk:24.65.54.59

November 2017
Hello, I'm Hamtechperson. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Getaway— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ham tech  person  02:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Geronimo Stilton has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Geronimo Stilton was changed by 24.65.54.59 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855815 on 2017-12-08T14:39:18+00:00.

January 2018
Please stop vandalizing List of Death in Paradise episodes.

--93.226.155.254 (talk) 05:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Richard-DIP (talk) 03:03, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Richard-DIP (talk) 03:10, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --Richard-DIP (talk) 04:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello 24.65.54.59. There are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Richard-DIP (talk) 02:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences — you must write using your own words. There are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here. You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here. It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Richard-DIP (talk) 15:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Richard-DIP (talk) 07:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Richard-DIP (talk) 22:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Please do not introduce speculative information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism or disruptive editing and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Richard-DIP (talk) 14:07, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello, I'm Launchballer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Doc Martin episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laun chba ller 09:57, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.