User talk:24.72.229.55

- Invitation to Dispute according to

According to, we need to focus on article content during discussions, not on editor conduct; comment on content, not the contributor, when there is disagreement on the content of a page. Please stay focused on the article content when you make changes.

Please elaborate on why these proposed changes deteriorate the content rather than improve it. I welcome your rational arguments about the content of the page and how the suggested changes affect the content of the page but will not tolerate bullying, especially when I firmly believe the proposed changes reflect the most up-to-date knowledge we have on the topic according to reliable sources.

Relatedly, according to "Academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources". Hence, the citations provided in these proposed changes are the most reliable source rather than "citespam".

24.72.229.55 (talk) 03:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)