User talk:24.92.243.9

February 2020
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bantu languages—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 23:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Berrely. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Luhya people—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Bᴇʀʀᴇʟʏ • Talk to me∕What have I been doing 09:13, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kisii people, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 19:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

While you are blocked, please read
WP:VERIFY, WP:RS and WP:NOR. Also Help:Referencing for beginners. Keep you personal opinions out of articles. "It is rude and uncalled for to call people what they are not and the Abagirango are not Luo. The Josuba, Joka-Jok and Joka-Kombe should be discussed on the Luo wikipedia page as they really belong there." doesn't belong in an article - have you ever read an encyclopedia and seen anything like that? Explain your edits also. Doug Weller talk 10:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 10:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Request for block review
24.92.243.9 (talk) 11:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia is actually not interested in truth, but in what can be verified. In addition, expert or deep knowledge of a subject is not required to edit any article or topic. Wikipedia does not hire people; editors are volunteers. 331dot (talk) 13:28, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Threatening to evade your block will not help you get unblocked. 331dot (talk) 13:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)


 * There is no evading block here, I am just being honest with you. Please stop blocking people carelessly and the people you block can still access it despite being blocked. So is blocking a solution? Your assertion that "Wikipedia is actually not interested in truth, but in what can be verified. In addition, expert or deep knowledge of a subject is not required to edit any article or topic. Wikipedia does not hire people; editors are volunteers. 331dot (talk) 13:28, 24 May 2020 (UTC)" justifies why Wikipedia is a rather useless page that needs to be replaced with more useful pages. So can you verify the false content you have on the Girango people? You are basically lying to people that the page is on the Girango people yet in the content you are really describing the Luo people. So how can you verify that information in an article that doesn't have citations? Since you created a page titled "Girango" and describing the Luo people, why didn't you instead add that description to the Luo people page since they already have a wikipedia page? Since wikipedia is edited by volunteers, why are these very volunteers blocking other volunteers and accusing other editors of the very mistakes they are committing? Expert knowledge of subject is crucial to ensure constructive edits and reversions. How can you edit what you don't understand? this is what makes wikipedia a weak page. So this block that you are defending is supposed to be an expert? this is a big joke. Wikipedia needs to look for serious experts that understand what they are editing and not just reverting other editors and blocking other editors just for the sake of doing it. I know you are trying your best to defend the blocker, but face the truth that the block was not necessary and the blocker is a weaker expert. He is not helping wikipedia by blocking other people whenever he feels like blocking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.92.243.9 (talk)
 * You only need one open request; subsequent comments should be standard, unformatted comments. 331dot (talk) 19:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

I would like to express my concerns about Dough Weller. After blocking me last month, he now seems to follow my edits with a bad motive as he appears to revert some of my edits perhaps to look for a reason to block me. I believe that Wikipedia has many administrators and I am requesting for Doug Weller to stop following me. I will be grateful if my request and concerns can be taken into consideration.24.92.243.9 (talk) 11:41, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The proper place for a grievance with administrator behavior would be the administrator's noticeboard. 331dot (talk) 11:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * That said, bringing a complaint there will result in your own behavior being examined as well, to see if Doug is correct to monitor your edits- as any editor is free to do. Be very sure that you want to go down that road before you post a grievance there. 331dot (talk) 11:47, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Gusii language has been reverted. Your edit here to Gusii language was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/99544/Nyauma_A%20Phonological%20Reconstruction%20of%20Ekegusii%20and%20Egekuria%20Nouns-a%20Comparative%20Analysis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Request for correction of Content in the "Girango People" Article.
I am requesting for the correction of content on the Girango people article or deletion of the article because it makes no sense. For instance, the title Girango and the content are not matching. The content describes the Luo people while the title talks about something else. The title also lacks citations to support the given claims on the article. The article appears to be a duplicate since there are already articles on the luo people and Suba people which makes the Girango article unnecessary. I am suggesting merging the article with the Luo people article since it is specifically talking about luos or deleting it because it makes no sense and the content is so mixed and uncited. Thank you for your understanding.24.92.243.9 (talk) 19:54, 26 July 2020 (UTC)