User talk:24.96.38.197

So this entry says there are multiple issues. One of the reasons might be that the authors are not tuned into the "average reader". So, when you try to read the article it immediately becomes (somewhat) esoteric.In the second sentence there is a reference to "nominal GDP" which should be obvious the author that  to most readers this term is unfamiliar. Therefore instead of the highlighted "nominal GDP" that you must "click", and be redirected to another page, which is very distracting, why not just explain "nominal GDP" right there in the text so the reader can have a continuous experience of the searched in the first place. Patrickpendola (talk) 23:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)