User talk:24.98.214.244

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to List of emo artists has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Double Blue (talk) 04:50, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to List of emo artists constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Double Blue (talk) 04:51, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to List of emo artists. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Double Blue (talk) 04:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to List of emo artists. Mifter (talk) 04:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: your message. Thank you for finally responding. Please use the Edit summary. It helps tremendously to explain what you are trying to do. I hope you can realise that unexplained removal of sourced content looks exactly like vandalism without an explanation. I suggest that you take your concerns to the talk page of List of emo artists and try to convince other editors that those artists are misplaced. Not only did someone think they were emo enough to add to the list but they have a reference for the assertion. I understand that emo can be a judgement call though. I fyou have a good argument, you should be able to convince people that you are correct and establish a consensus that those artists should not be put on the list. Cheers! Double Blue (talk) 05:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)