User talk:2401:4900:4714:8F51:5425:E34B:38A1:D7DB

January 2021
Hello, I'm FozzieHey. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pathak, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FozzieHey (talk) 18:57, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. Your recent edit to Pathak appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pathak. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. The need for a person to have an article before adding them to such a list was explained above and is clearly stated at both the top and bottom of that list - Arjayay (talk) 19:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pathak, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 19:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)