User talk:2401:4900:52F9:1AFD:ADD2:E67A:6D57:D483

Welcome!
Hi 2401:4900:52F9:1AFD:ADD2:E67A:6D57:D483! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 13:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring at Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 13:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

There was a discussion about the fatwa at Talk:Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi. Please read it. In one of your edits you left an edit summary saying "Unexplained content removal and possible pov issues." If you had read the discussion you would understand why it was right to remove the section as worded. -- Toddy1 (talk) 14:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)