User talk:2402:1980:8254:63EA:2863:5929:44AD:5D66

June 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gawai Dayak have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gawai Dayak. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 15:55, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please explain the meaning of "non-constructive contribution"? Your own comment above is not constructive because you did describe why my contribution is non-construction? Fyi, I had to correct a few sentences in there because they were not true eg "ranyai is erected as backdrop" which is not the original purpose of ranyai; "Women give tuak to men and the winner is awarded what, I forgot" - this is not true. I edited Gawai Dayak to keep its trueness.
 * Hi. I've noticed that you've made some contributions in a few Dayak related articles. The issue is that information that you've added in those article are largely without citing any reliable scholarly sources. As it is already, most of the Dayak related articles are facing the same issue of lacking proper citation. Adding more information without citing any sources will only pile up the problem and in the long run making those Dayak related articles as unreliable. Please take your time to read Citing sources and Citation templates for more info. You can also look for articles that are rated as Class-GA, Class-A or Class-FA at the WikiProject Malaysia/Assessment as examples to follow for further improving an article. Also, if you wish to give a meaningful contribution under the same IP address, please register. -Jeblat (talk) 13:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)