User talk:2402:3A80:1639:8A74:0:9:C38:A301

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lukanand Kshetrimayum (May 25)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lukanand_Kshetrimayum Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.

If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

The statement "The film was widely appreciated by the audience and film critics" should not be in the lede paragraph in the voice of Wikipedia, and is characteristic of submissions that are intended to praise the subject rather than to describe them neutrally.

This draft has now bee declined seven times and moved from article space back to draft space twice, by six reviewers. These included six declines for the lack of footnotes, a pattern that makes it clear that this editor does not take advice and is not interested in working collaboratively with other editors. This submission is Rejected this time. There is no value to trying to explain to the submitter what needs to be done. If a neutral editor wants to develop a draft on this person, then can discuss and can obtain a rough consensus. If the author continues to try to resubmit, a topic-ban may be requested.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:06, 25 May 2020 (UTC)