User talk:2402:3A80:1839:AD6C:0:27:E61:5901

Problematic edits
If you keep making problematic edits like these and these, the article is going to be protected so that you can't edit it. There are many more issues, and all of them are problematic. If English is not your strong suit, maybe you should edit at a Wikipedia in your native tongue. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:43, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) You don't seem to understand basic concepts about what sort of content we're looking for in articles and the result of your changes is an absolute mess. See MOS:TV and Template:Infobox television so you can learn how to properly structure a television article. And you should probably look at a quality article like Ed, Edd n Eddy so you know what the goal is.
 * 2) Stop bloating the genre with irrelevant genre. The purpose of genre is to identify the general shape of the series, not to indicate every narrative technique employed. "Soap opera" properly describes a melodrama that has romantic, dramatic and occasionally comedic elements. If no sources describe the series as a "soap opera romance drama comedy", then we should not either.
 * 3) You can't invent new infobox parameters and you shouldn't be misusing the ones that are there. also known and additional are not valid parameters.
 * 4) The related parameter is for spin-offs, reboots and adaptations, not for shows that are tangentially related in theme or that one of the cast/crew worked on.
 * 5) We do not delineate series stars in the infobox by what season they were in. The only valid content for starring are people's names.
 * 6) We do not use "pseudoheadings" in sections like you did by formatting sub-sections like Season 2: (2020-Present) . Use proper sub-section formatting. Also, "Present" is not the beginning of a sentence or a proper noun, so it should not be capitalised.