User talk:2402:8100:2000:0:0:0:0:0/35

Requesting block review
, I feel like blocking this user seems way too much. A user warning should have been sufficient. Please remember to assume good faith. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 16:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Please post on Drmies' user talk to address them directly. I'm not sure what your interest here is, but if your concerns are not resolved to your satisfaction through discussion with them, WP:ANI is the next stop. 331dot (talk) 20:39, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikiexplorationandhelping, this is a wide range; there is no "this user" here. And if there were, they would have been warned dozens of times already: feel free to look at all the edits and all the talk pages. I just checked the log: I have never seen a range on which CU was run so often. You are also welcome to ask User:Pbritti for information. Drmies (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2022 (UTC)


 * As Drmies put it, there's more than one persistent issue here. Besides an extended sockpuppetry vandalism campaign from, this range is responsible for an incredibly long list of other vandalizing edits and CIR violations. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:17, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * and, ah, now I see. I just checked the block log, there were tons of blocks for vandalism. Before I checked, all I saw for the contributions for this IP address was just a single edit. I immediately thought that a full on 6 month block for a single edit was way too excessive. My apologies. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 22:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No problem. Drmies (talk) 22:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)