User talk:2402:A00:401:7C3E:4D11:C044:1AD5:F1BC

November 2023
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Divya Dwivedi. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 09:17, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * User:Beccaynr You must know you can be brought to WP:ANI for the malicious warning above. Be aware. 2402:A00:401:7C3E:4D11:C044:1AD5:F1BC (talk) 09:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I have asked you to discuss this at the article talk page several times, and continue to suggest that as an option. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 09:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * User:Beccaynr Read WP:NOTBURO. You cannot simply redirect me to talk page when you have no justification for your misleading reverts. 2402:A00:401:7C3E:4D11:C044:1AD5:F1BC (talk) 09:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Divya Dwivedi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Beccaynr (talk) 09:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 17:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)