User talk:2403:6200:8813:3D25:B535:56EF:6EB5:CF2

December 2021
Hello, I'm Such-change47. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to James Ma have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Such-change47 (talk) 23:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at James Ma, you may be blocked from editing. Kaseng55 (talk) 00:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history at James Ma shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kaseng55 (talk) 00:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Kaseng55 (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Can you please block this ip for Edit Warring asap! Chip3004 (talk) 01:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * This IP has been using a /64 range which has been blocked for a week per this AN3 closure. If the problem continues after that let me know. EdJohnston (talk) 21:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)