User talk:2403:6200:8871:789F:F96F:4D06:1062:A7D4

July 2023
Thank you for making a report about at Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. You should not report BangJan1999 to WP:AIV, regardless it is still an bad report. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Untamed1910. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:33, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, you may be blocked from editing. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:36, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


 * As has been noted repeatedly, your reports at WP:AIV have been declined, because the user you reported has not committed any vandalism. Your repeated edits are entering the realm of bad-faith edits and disruption. Do not revert or re-report the user to the vandalism noticeboard again. —C.Fred (talk) 02:38, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Alisa Kozhikina shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 02:38, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:53, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Further contact
Please contact info-en-q@wikimedia.org for further guidance regarding the Alisa Kozhikina article. BangJan1999 02:53, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

I still want article about me to be deleted from Wikipedia, but I will NOT request speedy deletion again, so please unblock Draft namespace, so I will be able to create new articles about something except for humans. 2403:6200:8871:789F:F96F:4D06:1062:A7D4 (talk) 03:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


 * I am not going to unblock you. I suggest you post a new unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 14:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC)