User talk:2404:C801:653:8577:D838:8CFF:FEA7:3BFB

Reply
You will find it easier if you register an account. If you do so, you should let me know the new account name on my talk page to reduce the risk of being blocked as another sockpuppet.

Thank you for declaring your COI, you should complete and save the the following on the user page (not the talk) of any account you create and save it. " I work in his research group. " Because you have an obvious conflict of interest, we recommend that you don't write on this topic, if you do, you must follow the guidance below
 * When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.


 * He's clearly notable. but most of the references were unsuitable, including YouTube, press releases and the like. Papers he has written are not independent third-party sources and shouldn't be used as sources. In fact, journal articles in general are primary sources that are inappropriate.


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. The whole tone is like a fan page, for example Wang has made original and seminal contributions... He was the first to recognize and exploit the potential of ZnO nanostructures for innovative applications... His discoveries and breakthrough works in developing nanogenerators have established the principle and technological road map... is basically self-praise and is sourced to... his own articles!
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * Much of the text looks as if it's been copied from somewhere, but I didn't check because it's so inappropriate anyway. The images are all claimed to have been created for this article. If they are used again, I will check to see if they have been previously published elsewhere, if so they will be deleted from Commons.

I'm not going to restore the article, it's completely unsuitable.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You should create any new text at Draft:Zhong Lin Wang and wait for it to be reviewed once you have submitted it for review.

I suggest that you look at Barbara McClintock and Pamela C. Rasmussen to see what articles about academic scientists should look like. Make sure you get this right, I won't hesitate to delete and block if we just get more of the same Jimfbleak - talk to me?  09:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)