User talk:2405:204:2296:E95E:D19:E566:D90E:D1F8

July 2019
Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Monomelic amyotrophy— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:38, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Simply stating that sourced content is wrong is not an appropriate edit. If there are competing interpretations, both should be stated in the text but a contradiction or clarification must cite a reliable, verifiable source. If you dispute the text altogether, you should start a discussion at the article's talk page or at the appropriate Wikiproject page or both to reach a consensus. Talk pages, Wikiprojects. Verifiability.


 * Helpful information about editing Wikipedia can be found on various Wikipedia guideline and policy pages including: Help:Getting started; Introduction; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Referencing for beginners; Identifying reliable sources; Citing sources; Help:Footnotes; Verifiability; No original research; Neutral point of view; Notability; Biographies of living persons; What Wikipedia is not; Manual of Style/Words to watch; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:43, 7 July 2019 (UTC)