User talk:2405:204:54A6:E7E7:3980:FFE7:4557:14F7

≈I don't think it's an issue to make changes with proper references. Wikipedia does not accept personal opinion for granted. What makes you revert my changes? I haven't written any biased or promotional content. So, please cooperate. Marnie Hawes (talk) 06:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * See the talk page where consensus was established for the usage of "perennial candidate" term. You have already been blocked recently and are tantalizingly close to another block for edit warring. 2405:204:54A6:E7E7:3980:FFE7:4557:14F7 (talk) 06:38, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * You seems to be hateful. So, you only checked I am blocked only? none of my contributions! What contributions have you made on Wikipedia instead of undoing my edits! I am a person not a robot or an IP address. I am seriously fade up. Why I might get blocked for editing with proper reference? Marnie Hawes (talk) 06:46, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hateful? Come on now. I just saw your talk page and got to know you were blocked and unblocked for some reason. I have made 100s of edits as an IP. You won't get blocked for adding references but for edit warring despite the fact that there is consensus against your changes. 2405:204:54A6:E7E7:3980:FFE7:4557:14F7 (talk) 06:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * My suggestion - edit some less controversial topics and gain some experience. By the way the other account which you say is your sister's, do you operate that as well? 2405:204:54A6:E7E7:3980:FFE7:4557:14F7 (talk) 06:55, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I was wondering to get your contribution list here. But, sorry to say, I have found nothing. https://tools.wmflabs.org/guc/?user=2405%3A204%3A54A6%3AE7E7%3A3980%3AFFE7%3A4557%3A14F7 Marnie Hawes (talk) 07:02, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I use dynamic IP so my contributions are scattered. My contribution history is not the issue here. Yours is, considering you have started edit warring right after your previous block. 2405:204:54A6:E7E7:3980:FFE7:4557:14F7 (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * My sister added a blog as a reference, I removed it. I added some references and a few sentences. If you had an issue you could have removed the sentence or a part. Why did you removed the references too! For the perennial candidate the 4th reference needs login to read it, is it really deserve to be there? Please, don't threaten me with blocking. I will accept it if I did something wrong. Marnie Hawes (talk) 07:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * You do realize that editing in the same pattern as your "sister" is considered to be meat puppetry, right? I am not threatening you. I am only warning you of the consequences. 2405:204:54A6:E7E7:3980:FFE7:4557:14F7 (talk) 07:20, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Nothing to say. Leaving this conversation. I failed to make you understood what I was trying to say.Thanks! Marnie Hawes (talk) 07:27, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Before you leave, read WP:SOURCEACCESS. Adios! 2405:204:54A6:E7E7:3980:FFE7:4557:14F7 (talk) 07:30, 1 October 2019 (UTC)