User talk:2405:7F00:9802:9600:986D:3A01:6E88:EC11

January 2020
Your edits here will continue to be reverted as they are not supported by reliable sources as is required. And if you write "we need more Asians not all are ugly" anywhere on Wikipedia, insinuating that someone here has suggested such, you will likely find yourself blocked in short order.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring to restore unsourced content
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)