User talk:2406:3400:21B:4020:68E2:19FD:D094:1D3A

May 2022
"Stop vandalizing Wikipedia or I'll lodge a formal complaint to get your account suspended"--good luck with that. Drmies (talk) 04:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)


 * So vandals can do whatever they do and no action can be taken against them.
 * What did Wikipedia do when it was vandalized by Scientology members? Didn't it suspend all of them?
 * Good luck with that? Are you sarcastic about Wikipedia? Why are using Wikipedia then? Or Wikipedia is a domain of a few fanatics who are disconnected from reality?
 * Peaceray reverted my corrections only to put it back a few minutes later. To save face, he put some absurd explanations for his backflip.
 * For now, vandals and their supporters (like you) have been defeated.
 * I am not very optimistic though. 2406:3400:21B:4020:68E2:19FD:D094:1D3A (talk) 07:16, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh dear. You are blocked because of your behavior. "Decent editors": decent editors try to make their case on the talk page. All this bullshit about fanatics and Qanon and scumbags, that's just so much hot air, besides a personal attack, and I'll make sure we won't hear those for a while, at least not from this range. Drmies (talk) 15:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Bhutan page was vandalized 48 times by the same group of people. If you read my comments 117 days ago (10 December 2021), I fully explained my correction believing it was just a mistake. Yet the vandals (or the trolls) kept vandalizing the Bhutan page without even bothering to put a single comment; hence I couldn't even tell what their motive was.
 * Besides that why would you bother to you make a case about "world is round, Paris is capital of France, etc". The vandals perfectly knew that what they were writing was simply untrue.
 * Decent editors wouldn't bother to make a case to criminals because it is simply pointless as proven on the 10th of December 2021. Go and read it again.
 * What exactly is wrong with telling those vandals to stop? What exactly is wrong with escalating it to Wikipedia admin?
 * If you see some vandals damaging some public property, is it an offense to tell them to stop? Is it an offense to report it Police (or even mentioning that you are going to report to Police if they don't back up).
 * Moreover what a hypocrite you are! Bullshit is an acceptable word?
 * How about "good luck with that"? Well, as I said, you ate those words. Just my simple warning caused the vandals to stop (at least for now).
 * Who gives you the right to block some user's IP just because he did the right thing.
 * Have you talked to me before blocking the IP? Was there any word in my comments which was even remotely offensive?
 * Yes the word "scumbag" is unacceptable as it is the case with everything you wrote and did BEFORE I used that term.
 * All your words and actions were offensive, inappropriate and unwarranted. Go and read you own comments.
 * Then explain me what makes you thing that you are not a "scumbag". Qanonbuster (talk) 06:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Peaceray. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Bhutan. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. ''Your edit summary MrOllie, last warning to you! Stop vandalizing Wikipedia or I'll lodge a formal complaint to get your account suspended violated WP:THREATEN.'' Peaceray (talk) 04:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * MrOllie is just vandalizing Wikipedia. He has a political agenda and changing Bhutan page without any comment with some untruthful comments. What is the capital of France? Is someone allowed to say it is London just because it suits him. He made the entire Wikipedia inconsistent. Look at the following page:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_territories_by_land_borders
 * Where is the threat in my comment? Aren't we supposed to complain about vandals and get their accounts suspended. 2406:3400:21B:4020:68E2:19FD:D094:1D3A (talk) 04:22, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Examples from WP:THREATEN:
 * "If you do that again, I will report you."
 * "Don't do that or you will be blocked." Peaceray (talk) 04:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * "appears to be China" Oh really. Paris appears to be capital of France.
 * What about the truth? It doesn't matter at all.
 * You think this is Qanon website.
 * So if someone repeatedly vandalizes Wikipedia and puts some alternative facts(!) without even bothering to put a comment, I cannot tell him to stop.
 * What I am supposed to do? Write a bot and automatically get it corrected (I can easily do that; I am an IT expert).
 * What do you mean by "take it to the talk page".
 * How do you talk to a fanatic (or rather a lunatic) who is disconnected from reality?
 * Name me a single country who recognizes Tibet. Name me a single source which has the same claim.
 * You may sympathize with Tibet (I do, as well). What about East Turkestan, then? Is it not a country? With this logic, you can change the entire world map.
 * What did Wikipedia do when it was vandalized by Scientology members? Did they took it to the talk page? They disallowed editing of the entire page!!! So long for your "inclusive atmosphere".
 * The following from your page:
 * "I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality."
 * Have you read and understood it?
 * According to your website you "appear" to be a decent human being. Are you really? Look at the mirror and answer this question. 2406:3400:21B:4020:68E2:19FD:D094:1D3A (talk) 07:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Peaceray, it was a silly, empty threat even before I blocked their range. Drmies (talk) 04:19, 5 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes, I know. I usually warn when I revert, even in this case when it might go against Do not feed the trolls. Better to have a record when something is going to the Administrators Noticeboard. Peaceray (talk) 04:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Where exactly is a threat in my comments? I am warning (telling) vandals to stop.
 * Look up in the dictionary what threat means.
 * And it wasn't definitely "empty". You ended up eating your words. Right?
 * My changes have been reinstated by the very same person who removed them (Peaceray).
 * If you dare, try to vandalize Bhutan page again and see what will happen?
 * I believe that vast majority of Wikipedia editors are decent people.
 * There is no place in Wikipedia for scumbags like you. 2406:3400:21B:4020:3C19:36D1:4AE5:4ABB (talk) 13:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * To be clear, I restored located between China and India as WP:EDITCONSENSUS & removed Bhutan and neighboring Tibet region experienced the spread of Buddhism to Bhutan and neighboring Tibet experienced the spread of Buddhism because the latter accurately reflected the fact that Tibet was an independent country when Buddhism arrived.
 * Please note that when I see threatening or insulting language in the edit summary, my initial course will be to revert that edit, then to sort out the proper changes later.
 * Please note that the Administrators' guide/Blocking states: Prevent this user from editing their own talk page while blocked self-explanatory – this should be left unless the blocked user disruptively edits their talk page or posts unblock abuse. I interpret this to mean that an editor can be blocked on their own talk page if their comments are abusive. Peaceray (talk) 15:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * First on  04:47, 5 May 2022‎, you said "take it to the talk page,do not edit war".
 * Yet  on   04:51, 5 May 2022, you contradicted yourself and did "edit war" without taking it "to the talk page".
 * Now  on   15:58, 5 May 2022, you came up with a third version of inconsistent story (more on the contents later).
 * So you are a proud Wikipedia editor; yet you are unable to write three coherent and consistent sentences in a row.
 * I understand that you are desperately trying to save face regarding your back-flip, but I wonder whether you heard the phrase "when you are in a hole, stop digging".
 * Now the content:
 * First the last bit :The issue was NEVER about "Tibet region". The vandals were not targeting that bit. Please go and check their attacks since December 2021. They vandalized Bhutan page regardless what was written there.
 * Everybody knows that there was the Tibetan empire in the past. Please go to the Tibet page to learn about Tibet's history.
 * That entire sentence is problematic and confusing either way, as Bhutan was part of the Tibetan empire anyway. Some genuine effort is required to put a proper explanation for that part. Again that was NEVER the issue.
 * Now the first and real issue: EDITCONSENSUS appears to be China. You can't have any consensus for a fact because it can be proven. What was the consensus regarding our planet during Galileo era? You can have consensus regarding theories, predictions, etc, but NEVER about facts simply because you don't need it. Facts have to be proven. What I wrote was a fact. Again, no sane can person can dispute a fact because it is proven. If something can be reasonably disputed, it is not a fact (yet). I do no mean to offend you, but it "appears" to me that you have serious logic problems.
 * One more thing (sorry Columbo). You said "my initial course will be to revert that edit, then to sort out the proper changes later" when you believed there was threat. Yet you reverted it second time even though there was not even a perceived threat at 04:35, 5 May 2022‎. Your comment is not only inconsistent, but also untruthful. You reverted something which only included explanations. Your claim is also dishonest. Right? Qanonbuster (talk) 08:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)