User talk:2409:4061:16:AEB3:5867:E5A5:E65C:9BBD

October 2020
Hello. I undid your latest contributions to 2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes. Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. If you have any questions, feel free to message me on my talk page. ❯❯ 1sub Atomic   (💬Talk)  11:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:19, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes was changed by 2409:4061:16:AEB3:5867:E5A5:E65C:9BBD (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871137 on 2020-10-08T11:19:57+00:00

I suggest you stop now.Slatersteven (talk) 11:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 11:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 11:31, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes. Materialscientist (talk) 11:31, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Read wp:brd, you now need to make a case at talk, not wp:editwar.Slatersteven (talk) 11:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC)