User talk:2409:4063:411B:95E4:B376:E93A:74E8:B800

Indic script
- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Dildarnagar Kamsar, and several other articles, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 15:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dildarnagar Kamsar, you may be blocked from editing. WP:NOINDICSCRIPT was explained to you above - please do NOT add/re-add to any relevant article - Arjayay (talk) 15:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dildarnagar Kamsar. which part of "WP:NOINDICSCRIPT was explained to you above - please do NOT add/re-add to any relevant article" are you having trouble understanding? - Arjayay (talk) 15:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mz7 (talk) 06:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.