User talk:2409:4072:6199:E7F8:B65E:1F71:1C49:B5A1

May 2021
Hello, I'm Ifnord. I noticed that you recently removed content from Vinayak Damodar Savarkar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ifnord (talk) 15:14, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 15:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored: do not remove information just because you have some personal objection to it. —C.Fred (talk) 15:37, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. —C.Fred (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC)


 * We invite you to explain at the article's talk page what problems you see with the information and the sources. However, you will need to do so in English.தகவல் மற்றும் ஆதாரங்களுடன் நீங்கள் காணும் பிரச்சினைகள் என்ன என்பதை கட்டுரையின் பேச்சு பக்கத்தில் விளக்க நாங்கள் உங்களை அழைக்கிறோம். இருப்பினும், நீங்கள் ஆங்கிலத்தில் அவ்வாறு செய்ய வேண்டும்.—C.Fred (talk) 15:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)